Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal workers have up until February 6 to decide whether to willingly leave their jobs. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, informed employees on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be permitted to take leave and be paid until completion of September. is an employment attorney who represents federal staff members as a large part of her practice, so I asked her for her interpretation about what OPM’s delayed resignation program would actually mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I actually do not consider it a lot a deal. I believe it’s a demand to resign with a vague guarantee that, possibly, you might be kept in administrative leave status for up to 8 months – however no guarantees.MARTIN: somalibidders.com Some individuals have actually been utilizing the term buyout to explain what this is since there appears to be the deal of administrative leave for as much as eight months if you take this offer. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would definitely not describe it as a buyout. I think that’s a very deceptive term to utilize in this situation. When you consider a buyout, there’s typically some sort of written agreement or a concrete deal to supply a benefit in exchange for waiving certain rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If clients ask you for your advice, what are you informing them?BERCOVICI: First thing we inform them is exercise severe care. There are no assurances consisted of in this email. The only thing I can inform you for certain is that if you change your mind, the agency’s probably not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are basically giving up control over a lot.MARTIN: Exists some category of worker who you believe this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is someone like that might this be an attractive offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement need to be the most careful due to the fact that leaving earlier than planned can have serious effects, potentially, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me simply play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She informed reporters that this is a great offer for individuals who don’t wish to return to the workplace. Let me just play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is a recommendation to federal employees that they have to return in – to work. And if they don’t, then they have the alternative to resign, and this administration is really kindly offering to pay them for 8 months.MARTIN: You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It just – in such a way, it breaks my heart that federal employees are being jerked around like this. It sends a signal to me that this return-to-office order is in bad faith, that it’s created to get folks who work actually hard to resign. I believe it’s attempting to pull the wool over a great deal of individuals’s eyes due to the fact that there are no guarantees. And these are individuals who like their task. They like the mission of the firm. They work hard. And today, they’re dealing with very tough choices, specifically if they’re remote. I imply, it’s extremely coercive.MARTIN: You state it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you’re someone who resides in Oregon and referall.us has been informed to report to D.C. otherwise we’re going to fire you, they might feel that they have no choice than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you expect legal difficulties simply to the deal itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This deal, to be sincere, is so unprecedented that I think a lot of us are still trying to find out what to do with it. I’m uncertain if the offer itself might be challengeable. I believe the larger concern is the execution of these terms. I’m not conscious of any authority that exists right now for OPM to buy agencies to provide this variety of individuals administrative leave. So I think it is quite potentially setting the stage for obstacles because I feel OPM has greatly surpassed their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is a work attorney with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you so much for joining us.BERCOVICI: Thank you so much for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of usage and authorizations pages at www.npr.org for more details.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This text may not remain in its final type and may be upgraded or modified in the future. Accuracy and accessibility might differ. The reliable record of NPR’s programs is the audio record.