Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: employment Federal employees have up until February 6 to choose whether to willingly leave their jobs. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, notified workers on Tuesday that if they hand in their by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be allowed to take leave and be paid until completion of September. Michelle Bercovici is an employment lawyer who represents federal workers as a big part of her practice, so I asked her for employment her interpretation about what OPM’s postponed resignation program would actually mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I in fact do not consider it so much an offer. I believe it’s a demand to resign with a vague promise that, potentially, you might be kept in administrative leave status for as much as eight months – however no guarantees.MARTIN: Some individuals have been utilizing the term buyout to explain what this is since there seems to be the offer of administrative leave for approximately 8 months if you take this offer. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would definitely not describe it as a buyout. I think that’s a very misleading term to use in this scenario. When you think of a buyout, there’s generally some sort of written agreement or a concrete deal to provide an advantage in exchange for waiving certain rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If clients ask you for your guidance, what are you telling them?BERCOVICI: First thing we tell them is workout severe care. There are no assurances consisted of in this e-mail. The only thing I can tell you for particular is that if you alter your mind, the company’s most likely not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are essentially providing up control over a lot.MARTIN: employment Exists some category of employee who you think this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is someone like that might this be an appealing offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement need to be the most careful since leaving earlier than meant can have serious effects, possibly, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me simply play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She informed reporters that this is a good deal for people who do not wish to go back to the office. Let me simply play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is a tip to federal workers that they need to return in – to work. And if they don’t, then they have the alternative to resign, and this administration is very generously providing to pay them for 8 months.MARTIN: You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It simply – in a method, it breaks my heart that federal staff members are being jerked around like this. It sends out a signal to me that this return-to-office order is in bad faith, that it’s developed to get folks who work really tough to resign. I think it’s attempting to pull the wool over a great deal of people’s eyes due to the fact that there are no assurances. And these are individuals who like their task. They like the objective of the agency. They strive. And employment today, they’re facing extremely hard choices, particularly if they’re remote. I indicate, it’s really coercive.MARTIN: You state it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you’re somebody who resides in Oregon and has been told to report to D.C. or else we’re going to fire you, they might feel that they have no option than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you expect legal obstacles simply to the deal itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This deal, to be sincere, is so unprecedented that I believe a lot of us are still attempting to determine what to do with it. I’m unsure if the deal itself might be challengeable. I believe the larger concern is the execution of these terms. I’m not familiar with any authority that exists right now for OPM to buy firms to offer this number of individuals administrative leave. So I think it is extremely much potentially setting the phase for difficulties since I feel OPM has vastly surpassed their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is an employment attorney with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you a lot for signing up with us.BERCOVICI: employment Thank you so much for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our site terms of usage and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional details.

NPR records are developed on a rush due date by an NPR contractor. This text may not remain in its final kind and might be upgraded or modified in the future. Accuracy and schedule might vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s shows is the audio record.