Vue d'ensemble

  • Fondée Date 9 octobre 1917
  • Les secteurs Construction
  • Offres D'Emploi 0
  • Vu 9

Description De L'Entreprise

This Stage Utilized 3 Reward Models

DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese expert system business that develops open-source large language models (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and funded by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, established the company in 2023 and serves as its CEO.

The DeepSeek-R1 model supplies actions comparable to other modern big language designs, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a substantially lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI’s GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and needs a tenth of the computing power of a similar LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI models were developed amidst United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were meant to limit the capability of these 2 countries to establish advanced AI systems. [6] [7]

On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek released its very first totally free chatbot app, based on the DeepSeek-R1 design, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had gone beyond ChatGPT as the most-downloaded complimentary app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] causing Nvidia’s share price to visit 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success versus larger and more established competitors has actually been described as « overthrowing AI », [8] constituting « the first chance at what is becoming a global AI area race », [11] and ushering in « a brand-new age of AI brinkmanship ». [12]

DeepSeek makes its generative expert system algorithms, models, and training details open-source, permitting its code to be easily offered for usage, modification, viewing, and creating files for building functions. [13] The business supposedly intensely hires young AI scientists from leading Chinese universities, [8] and works with from outside the computer technology field to diversify its models’ understanding and capabilities. [3]

In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI lover Liang Wenfeng, who had been trading since the 2007-2008 monetary crisis while going to Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he developed High-Flyer as a hedge fund concentrated on developing and utilizing AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer exclusively used AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has actually made its generative expert system chatbot open source, indicating its code is easily readily available for use, adjustment, and watching. This consists of permission to gain access to and utilize the source code, in addition to design documents, for constructing functions. [13]

According to 36Kr, Liang had actually constructed up a store of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are utilized to train AI [16], before the United States federal government enforced AI chip limitations on China. [15]

In April 2023, High-Flyer started a synthetic basic intelligence lab dedicated to research developing AI tools different from High-Flyer’s financial business. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the financiers, the laboratory became its own company, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Equity capital companies hesitated in providing financing as it was not likely that it would have the ability to produce an exit in a short period of time. [15]

After releasing DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which provided strong performance for a low rate, DeepSeek ended up being referred to as the catalyst for China’s AI design cost war. It was quickly dubbed the « Pinduoduo of AI », and other major tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba began to cut the price of their AI models to take on the business. Despite the low price charged by DeepSeek, it paid compared to its rivals that were losing money. [20]

DeepSeek is concentrated on research and has no comprehensive prepare for commercialization; [20] this also enables its technology to avoid the most rigid provisions of China’s AI guidelines, such as requiring consumer-facing technology to comply with the government’s controls on information. [3]

DeepSeek’s employing choices target technical abilities instead of work experience, resulting in many new hires being either recent university graduates or developers whose AI careers are less developed. [18] [3] Likewise, the business recruits people with no computer technology background to help its innovation comprehend other topics and understanding areas, consisting of having the ability to generate poetry and carry out well on the infamously difficult Chinese college admissions exams (Gaokao). [3]

Development and release history

DeepSeek LLM

On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek launched its first series of model, DeepSeek-Coder, which is readily available totally free to both researchers and industrial users. The code for the model was made open-source under the MIT license, with an extra license agreement (« DeepSeek license ») regarding « open and responsible downstream use » for the design itself. [21]

They are of the very same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed below. The series consists of 8 models, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]

1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base designs.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of instruction data. This produced the Instruct models.

They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, connected by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]

On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek released the DeepSeek-LLM series of designs, with 7B and 67B parameters in both Base and Chat kinds (no Instruct was released). It was developed to contend with other LLMs available at the time. The paper declared benchmark outcomes greater than the majority of open source LLMs at the time, especially Llama 2. [26]: area 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the design was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the model itself. [27]

The architecture was basically the exact same as those of the Llama series. They utilized the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text gotten by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]

The Chat versions of the 2 Base designs was likewise released concurrently, obtained by training Base by monitored finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]

On 9 January 2024, they released 2 DeepSeek-MoE models (Base, Chat), each of 16B parameters (2.7 B triggered per token, 4K context length). The training was essentially the like DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They declared comparable performance with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a variant of the basic sparsely-gated MoE, with « shared specialists » that are always queried, and « routed experts » that might not be. They discovered this to assist with expert balancing. In basic MoE, some experts can end up being extremely relied on, while other specialists might be seldom used, squandering parameters. Attempting to balance the specialists so that they are equally utilized then triggers experts to reproduce the exact same capability. They proposed the shared experts to discover core capabilities that are often utilized, and let the routed professionals to find out the peripheral capacities that are hardly ever utilized. [28]

In April 2024, they launched 3 DeepSeek-Math designs specialized for doing mathematics: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]

1. Initialize with a previously pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base design.
3. Train an instruction-following model by SFT Base with 776K math problems and their tool-use-integrated detailed options. This produced the Instruct design.
Reinforcement learning (RL): The reward design was a procedure reward design (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd approach. [30] This benefit model was then used to train Instruct using group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K math concerns « associated to GSM8K and MATH ». The benefit model was continuously updated during training to avoid benefit hacking. This led to the RL model.

V2

In May 2024, they released the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series consists of 4 designs, 2 base designs (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The 2 bigger models were trained as follows: [31]

1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K utilizing YaRN. [32] This led to DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M circumstances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for security. This led to DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not released.
4. RL utilizing GRPO in 2 stages. The first phase was trained to fix math and coding issues. This phase utilized 1 benefit design, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for mathematics). The second stage was trained to be helpful, safe, and follow rules. This stage used 3 reward designs. The helpfulness and security reward designs were trained on human preference data. The rule-based benefit design was manually configured. All experienced benefit models were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This resulted in the launched variation of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.

They chose for 2-staged RL, due to the fact that they discovered that RL on reasoning data had « distinct qualities » different from RL on basic data. For instance, RL on thinking might enhance over more training steps. [31]

The two V2-Lite designs were smaller, and trained likewise, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat just underwent SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite variation to help « further research and advancement on MLA and DeepSeekMoE ». [31]

Architecturally, the V2 models were significantly modified from the DeepSeek LLM series. They altered the basic attention mechanism by a low-rank approximation called multi-head latent attention (MLA), and utilized the mix of professionals (MoE) alternative previously published in January. [28]

The Financial Times reported that it was cheaper than its peers with a rate of 2 RMB for every single million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]

In June 2024, they released 4 models in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]

1. The Base models were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the version at the end of pretraining), then pretrained further for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base models.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were used to produce 20K code-related and 30K math-related instruction information, then combined with an instruction dataset of 300M tokens. This was utilized for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The benefit for mathematics issues was computed by comparing with the ground-truth label. The reward for code issues was generated by a benefit model trained to anticipate whether a program would pass the system tests.

DeepSeek-V2.5 was launched in September and updated in December 2024. It was made by combining DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]

V3

In December 2024, they launched a base design DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat model DeepSeek-V3. The model architecture is essentially the same as V2. They were trained as follows: [37]

1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, mostly English and Chinese. It included a greater ratio of math and programs than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length two times, from 4K to 32K and then to 128K, utilizing YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 epochs on 1.5 M samples of reasoning (mathematics, programs, reasoning) and non-reasoning (imaginative writing, roleplay, easy concern answering) data. Reasoning information was generated by « professional models ». Non-reasoning data was produced by DeepSeek-V2.5 and examined by humans. – The « skilled designs » were trained by starting with an unspecified base design, then SFT on both data, and artificial information created by an internal DeepSeek-R1 design. The system prompt asked the R1 to show and verify during thinking. Then the specialist designs were RL using an unspecified benefit function.
– Each expert model was trained to produce just synthetic thinking data in one particular domain (mathematics, shows, reasoning).
– Expert designs were used, rather of R1 itself, because the output from R1 itself suffered « overthinking, poor formatting, and excessive length ».

4. Model-based reward models were made by starting with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human preference information containing both final reward and chain-of-thought leading to the last benefit. The reward design produced reward signals for both concerns with objective but free-form responses, and questions without objective answers (such as creative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO using both benefit designs and rule-based benefit. The rule-based benefit was computed for mathematics issues with a final response (put in a box), and for programming problems by system tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.

The DeepSeek group carried out comprehensive low-level engineering to accomplish efficiency. They utilized mixed-precision arithmetic. Much of the forward pass was performed in 8-bit floating point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) instead of the basic 32-bit, needing special GEMM routines to accumulate precisely. They utilized a custom-made 12-bit float (E5M6) for just the inputs to the linear layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states were in 16-bit (BF16). They reduced the communication latency by overlapping extensively computation and communication, such as devoting 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for only inter-GPU interaction. They reduced interaction by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the specific maker each specialist was on in order to avoid particular machines being queried more frequently than the others, including auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing methods. [37]

After training, it was released on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are linked by NVLink, and the clusters are connected by InfiniBand. [37]

Benchmark tests show that DeepSeek-V3 exceeded Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]

R1

On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview ended up being available by means of DeepSeek’s API, along with via a chat user interface after logging in. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for sensible reasoning, mathematical thinking, and real-time analytical. DeepSeek declared that it exceeded performance of OpenAI o1 on benchmarks such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal mentioned when it utilized 15 problems from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 model reached an option faster than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]

On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek launched DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The business likewise launched some « DeepSeek-R1-Distill » designs, which are not initialized on V3-Base, however rather are initialized from other pretrained open-weight models, consisting of LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on artificial data generated by R1. [47]

A conversation between User and Assistant. The user asks a concern, and the Assistant fixes it. The assistant first considers the reasoning process in the mind and after that supplies the user with the response. The reasoning process and response are confined within and tags, respectively, i.e., thinking process here respond to here. User:. Assistant:

DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained specifically using GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous versions, they utilized no model-based reward. All benefit functions were rule-based, « primarily » of two types (other types were not defined): accuracy benefits and format benefits. Accuracy reward was checking whether a boxed response is proper (for math) or whether a code passes tests (for programs). Format reward was checking whether the design puts its thinking trace within … [47]

As R1-Zero has issues with readability and blending languages, R1 was trained to resolve these issues and more improve reasoning: [47]

1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on « thousands » of « cold-start » information all with the basic format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the exact same RL procedure as R1-Zero, but likewise with a « language consistency benefit » to encourage it to respond monolingually. This produced an internal model not released.
3. Synthesize 600K reasoning information from the internal model, with rejection sampling (i.e. if the generated thinking had a wrong last answer, then it is eliminated). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning information (writing, accurate QA, self-cognition, translation) using DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K artificial data for 2 dates.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based reward (for thinking jobs) and model-based reward (for non-reasoning tasks, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.

Distilled models were trained by SFT on 800K data synthesized from DeepSeek-R1, in a comparable way as action 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]

Assessment and reactions

DeepSeek launched its AI Assistant, which utilizes the V3 model as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had surpassed ChatGPT as the highest-rated free app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot reportedly addresses questions, resolves reasoning issues and writes computer programs on par with other chatbots on the market, according to benchmark tests utilized by American AI companies. [3]

DeepSeek-V3 utilizes significantly less resources compared to its peers; for instance, whereas the world’s leading AI companies train their chatbots with supercomputers utilizing as many as 16,000 graphics processing systems (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek claims to require just about 2,000 GPUs, namely the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at an expense of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is roughly one tenth of what United States Meta invested developing its most current AI technology. [3]

DeepSeek’s competitive performance at fairly very little cost has been recognized as potentially challenging the international supremacy of American AI designs. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, described the release of its chatbot as a « Sputnik minute » for American AI. [49] [50] The efficiency of its R1 design was reportedly « on par with » one of OpenAI’s latest designs when utilized for jobs such as mathematics, coding, and natural language thinking; [51] echoing other analysts, American Silicon Valley investor Marc Andreessen likewise described R1 as « AI‘s Sputnik minute ». [51]

DeepSeek’s creator, Liang Wenfeng has been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media extensively applauded DeepSeek as a national possession. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang invited Liang Wenfeng to his seminar with professionals and asked him to offer viewpoints and tips on a draft for remarks of the annual 2024 government work report. [55]

DeepSeek’s optimization of minimal resources has actually highlighted potential limits of United States sanctions on China’s AI advancement, that include export restrictions on advanced AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the business’s AI models as a result « sparked market chaos » [57] and triggered shares in major international innovation business to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of rival Broadcom. Other tech firms likewise sank, including Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip devices maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] A worldwide selloff of innovation stocks on Nasdaq, prompted by the release of the R1 model, had actually resulted in record losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and computer system hardware business; [59] by 28 January 2025, an overall of $1 trillion of value was rubbed out American stocks. [50]

Leading figures in the American AI sector had combined responses to DeepSeek’s success and efficiency. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose companies are associated with the United States government-backed « Stargate Project » to establish American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek « incredibly outstanding ». [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who announced The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a favorable advancement. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, including Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk expressed skepticism of the app’s performance or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various business, including Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are looking for to use the model in their program. [68]

On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek restricted its brand-new user registration to contact number from mainland China, e-mail addresses, or Google account logins, following a « large-scale » cyberattack interrupted the appropriate functioning of its servers. [69] [70]

Some sources have actually observed that the main application shows interface (API) variation of R1, which ranges from servers located in China, uses censorship mechanisms for topics that are thought about politically delicate for the federal government of China. For example, the model refuses to answer concerns about the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, contrasts in between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI may initially generate an answer, however then deletes it quickly afterwards and changes it with a message such as: « Sorry, that’s beyond my existing scope. Let’s discuss something else. » [72] The incorporated censorship systems and limitations can only be gotten rid of to a restricted extent in the open-source variation of the R1 model. If the « core socialist values » specified by the Chinese Internet regulative authorities are touched upon, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, conversations are ended. [74] When evaluated by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 described Taiwan as « an inalienable part of China’s territory, » and mentioned: « We strongly oppose any kind of ‘Taiwan self-reliance’ separatist activities and are committed to achieving the complete reunification of the motherland through serene methods. » [75] In January 2025, Western scientists had the ability to trick DeepSeek into providing particular answers to some of these topics by requesting in its response to switch particular letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]

Security and personal privacy

Some professionals fear that the government of China might use the AI system for foreign impact operations, spreading disinformation, monitoring and the advancement of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s privacy terms and conditions say « We save the info we collect in protected servers located in the People’s Republic of China … We may collect your text or audio input, timely, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other material that you supply to our design and Services ». Although the information storage and collection policy follows ChatGPT’s personal privacy policy, [79] a Wired short article reports this as security concerns. [80] In reaction, the Italian information defense authority is seeking additional information on DeepSeek’s collection and usage of personal information, and the United States National Security Council announced that it had actually started a nationwide security evaluation. [81] [82] Taiwan’s federal government prohibited using DeepSeek at federal government ministries on security grounds and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened an inquiry into DeepSeek’s usage of individual information. [83]

Expert system market in China.

Notes

^ a b c The variety of heads does not equivalent the variety of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the design named DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was launched as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview required selecting « Deep Think enabled », and every user could utilize it only 50 times a day.
References

^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). « China’s cheap, open AI model DeepSeek thrills scientists ». Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). « The DeepSeek panic exposes an AI world all set to blow ». The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). « How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Competing With Silicon Valley Giants ». The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). « DeepSeek’s cheaper designs and weaker chips bring into question trillions in AI facilities spending ». Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). « Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports may hit India’s AI aspirations ». The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). « Nvidia investigation signals expanding of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly ». Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). « Nvidia targeted by China in new chip war probe ». BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). « What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.? ». The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). « China’s DeepSeek AI dethrones ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you ought to know ». CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). « What is DeepSeek, and why is it triggering Nvidia and other stocks to plunge? ». CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). « Nvidia, Microsoft shares topple as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants ». ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). « Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I. » The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). « ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key ». Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). « How a leading Chinese AI model conquered US sanctions ». MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). « Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker ». ChinaTalk. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). « Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I. » CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023). » [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says ». Yicai Global. Archived from the initial on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). « Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is altering how AI models are trained ». South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). « The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI leader ». Financial Times. Archived from the initial on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). « Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race ». ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ « DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at primary · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder ». GitHub. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ « DeepSeek Coder ». deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ « deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face ». huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, obtained 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ « config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at main ». huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ « config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at primary ». huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ « deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face ». huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ « config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at primary ». huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). « Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s brand-new AI model outshines Meta, OpenAI products ». South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). « DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, exceeds Llama and Qwen on launch ». VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). « DeepSeek’s brand-new AI model seems one of the finest ‘open’ challengers yet ». TechCrunch. Archived from the original on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ « Deepseek Log in page ». DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ « News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: unleashing supercharged thinking power! ». DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the original on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). « DeepSeek’s first thinking design R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 efficiency ». VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). « Don’t Look Now, but China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast ». The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ « Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce ». GitHub. Archived from the original on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs through Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ « Chinese AI start-up DeepSeek surpasses ChatGPT on Apple App Store ». Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). « American AI has reached its Sputnik moment ». The Hill. Archived from the original on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). « ‘ Sputnik minute’: $1tn wiped off US stocks after Chinese firm reveals AI chatbot » – through The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). « Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets ». BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). « What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI start-up that shook the tech world?|CNN Business ». CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ « DeepSeek positions an obstacle to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley ». The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). « Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock rout, Graphika states ». Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). « 量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 , 他还创办了 » AI界拼多多 » ». finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). « Chinese AI business’s AI design advancement highlights limits of US sanctions ». Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ « DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot triggers US market chaos, cleaning $500bn off Nvidia ». BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). « Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap ». Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). « DeepSeek sparks international AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of worth ». Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). « DeepSeek, Calling It ‘Impressive’ but Staying Skeptical ». Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). « Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella promotes DeepSeek’s open-source AI as « super outstanding »: « We should take the advancements out of China extremely, really seriously » ». Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). « OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek model ‘impressive' ». The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). « Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‘wake-up call’ after tech stocks slide ». The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). « Johnson slams China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek advancement « positive » ». Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). « China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street » – by means of NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). « Musk dismisses, Altman applauds: What leaders state on DeepSeek’s disruption ». Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ « Elon Musk ‘questions’ DeepSeek’s claims, suggests massive Nvidia GPU facilities ». Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. « Big AWS customers, including Stripe and Toyota, are pestering the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI designs ». Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). « DeepSeek struck with ‘massive’ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app shops ». The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. « DeepSeek temporarily limited new sign-ups, citing ‘massive malicious attacks' ». Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). « Chinese AI has actually stimulated a $1 trillion panic – and it does not care about totally free speech ». The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). « DeepSeek: This is what live censorship looks like in the Chinese AI chatbot ». Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). « We tried DeepSeek. It worked well, till we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan ». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ « The Guardian view on an international AI race: geopolitics, development and the increase of turmoil ». The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). « Chinese AI DeepSeek jolts Silicon Valley, offering the AI race its ‘Sputnik moment' ». NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). « China’s DeepSeek AI positions formidable cyber, data privacy hazards ». Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). « Experts prompt caution over use of Chinese AI DeepSeek ». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). « DeepSeek’s success has painted a substantial TikTok-shaped target on its back ». LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ « Privacy policy ». Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). « DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China ». Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ « Italy regulator inquires from DeepSeek on information security ». Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). « White House examines effect of China AI app DeepSeek on nationwide security, authorities says ». Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.